Stefano Sensi’s transfer to Leicester collapsed on Thursday night, reigniting past frustrations about the club’s transfer dealings in recent years.
With no explanation from Leicester’s recruitment team and a silent Enzo Maresca, speculation arises as to why the deal fell through. Did someone change their mind, was there a medical issue that needed to be concealed, or did Jon Rudkin simply forget to send an email?
Many suspect financial pressure played a role, as Leicester has implemented a one-in, one-out transfer policy for the last eighteen months. The struggle to offload unwanted players has been a recurring problem for the club, leading to criticism and accusations of mismanagement.
Part of the issue lies in Leicester’s tendency to reward underperforming players with long-term contracts, only exacerbating their difficulty in moving players on. A prime example is the recent arrest of Hamza Choudhury, who received a new contract despite past disciplinary issues, as well as others who have been handed contracts based on personal connections rather than merit.
The club’s pattern of extending contracts for sentimental reasons rather than the club’s best interest has caused ire among fans and pundits alike. It has resulted in the club being burdened with high-earning players who contribute minimally on the pitch, leading to financial strain and unfulfilled potential on the squad.
