Daniel Farke has every right to be frustrated after Leeds United signed Ao Tanaka on Deadline Day without consulting him, according to Dan Bardell.
According to Rheinische Post, Tanaka was not the first choice midfield option for the Whites during the transfer window, leading to disagreements between the club and Farke. The German manager was not informed about the signing of the 25-year-old from Dusseldorf, causing tension after other potential deals were rejected.
Sky Sports and talkSPORT journalist Bardell supports Farke’s reaction, noting that this is a common occurrence in modern football. He explained, “A lot of signings are made without the manager’s input, and while Tanaka may be a good addition to Leeds, Farke has the right to be upset if he wasn’t involved in the decision-making process.”
Despite Tanaka quickly becoming a fan favorite after a brief appearance against Hull City, Farke may still be frustrated with how the transfer was handled. It is important for clubs to involve their managers in transfer dealings, as the manager is ultimately responsible for selecting the team.
While Leeds United may benefit from Tanaka’s potential, Farke’s frustration highlights the importance of communication and collaboration within the club hierarchy. Farke’s reaction serves as a reminder that the manager should be involved in all aspects of player recruitment to ensure a cohesive team dynamic.