TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE ‘Absolute Nonsense… A lack of respect’ – Angry Blades boss Wilder hits back at O’Shea comments furiously.

Sheffield United boss Chris Wilder has delivered a stinging rebuttal to Ipswich Town captain Dara O’Shea, dismissing the defender’s assessment of their recent encounter as “absolute nonsense” and a “lack of respect.”

​The friction stems from Sheffield United’s 3-1 victory at Bramall Lane, where goals from Callum O’Hare, Andre Brooks, and Patrick Bamford secured the points for the Blades. Following the defeat, O’Shea suggested that the match was defined by United’s physical, direct approach rather than tactical superiority.

​The Captain’s Critique

​In his post-match comments, O’Shea downplayed the quality of the goals conceded, attributing the loss to the “scrappy” and “direct” nature of Sheffield United’s play. His main points included:

  • Direct Tactics: O’Shea claimed the ball was constantly in the air and that the Blades focused on “crashing in” to disrupt Ipswich.
  • The “Scrap”: He argued that off-the-ball incidents and high tempers were exactly the kind of game Sheffield United “wanted.”
  • Character: The captain suggested that while the physicality was expected, Ipswich had the character to handle it, implying the defeat was more about the style of the game than being outplayed.

​Wilder’s “Nonsense” Rebuttal

​Chris Wilder wasted no time in defending his team’s performance, firmly rejecting the idea that his side relied on “rough-and-tumble” tactics to win. Wilder emphasized that his team simply mastered the fundamental demands of a football match.

​”The perception… that we wanted it to be a spiky game, a bitty game… it’s absolute nonsense,” Wilder stated.

​Wilder’s defense focused on several key arguments:

  1. Fundamental Football: He argued that winning races, winning tackles, and “running around” are essential parts of the sport, not evidence of a lack of quality.
  2. Disrespect: He viewed O’Shea’s comments as a slight against his players’ technical ability, noting that they didn’t just fight—they “played.”
  3. The Result: For Wilder, the 3-1 scoreline was a reflection of his team’s superiority in all facets of the game, not just the physical ones.

​The war of words highlights a classic clash of perspectives in the Championship: one side viewing a physical defeat as a “scrappy” outlier, and the other seeing it as a comprehensive victory earned through hard work and execution.

Melarh

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *